Jane Austen Novels and Hannah More’s Life – intersecting planes

Jane Austen and Hannah More were contemporaries in the late 1700s and early 1800s (even though More was born long before Austen and lived well after Austen’s death). Austen is known for her novels, and while she did not invent this literary art form she deserves credit in my opinion for bringing it to maturity. Her stories continue to resonate with modern readers who can read her prose with ease.

More, on the other hand, wrote only one novel. Her writing talents were found in great abundance in plays, essays, tracts, and poetry and non-fiction works designed to better society. The style of writing she employed is at times inaccessible to modern readers who are unused to blatant pedantry from popular authors, which likely accounts for her being relatively unknown as a writer today.

More was quite popular in her time, though, selling multiple editions of her writings and influencing her nation for the improvement of education for the poor, providing food for starving villagers, putting an end to the infliction of animal cruelty in the name of entertainment and industry, and – the cause she is best known for – the abolition of slavery.

Austen, on the other hand, never wrote a pedantic piece to advance any cause whatever. Instead, she famously noted in a letter to her nephew, she considered herself ill-suited for grand feats:

How could I possibly join them on to the little bit (two inches wide) of ivory on which I work with so fine a brush, as produces little effect after much labour?

Jane Austen’s self-deprecation does not stand up to the fact that every one of her six novels is now a considered a masterpiece. She knew her novels were not held equal to the serious works of writers like Hannah More, yet in reading Karen Swallow Prior’s new biography of More, Fierce Convictions, I saw repeated parallels in the fictional lives of characters created by Jane Austen and the real life of Hannah More.

Prior herself draws a parallel between the somewhat dubious reputation of plays and performances in that era and the way Austen treated the subject in Mansfield Park. Many other parallels came to mind as I read More’s biography, and they are worth considering further. This is not an exhaustive list of the connections I saw but here are some that Jane Austen fans will appreciate.

The Slave Trade

Hannah More grew up near Bristol, a port city heavily reliant on the slave trade for its wealth. Her personal acquaintance with the economic realities of slavery and her later study of its barbarity led her to work diligently and tirelessly for decades to abolish slavery throughout Great Britain and its realms.

Jane Austen touched on slavery twice. In Mansfield Park the wealthy Sir Thomas Bertram returns from his plantations in the West Indies and his young ward Fanny Price asks him of the slave trade, a subject no one else in the room was apparently willing to bring up but which her cousin Edmund, Sir Thomas’ son, assures her was completely appropriate to discuss.

A closer connection to Hannah More’s background is found in Jane Austen’s Emma. The young Mrs. Elton, a character who appears a few chapters into the book, is from Bristol. Soon after arrival she takes an interest – the interest of a busybody – in Jane Fairfax. Miss Fairfax, though from a good family, is an orphan who must find employment and is forced to consider taking a position as a governess. She is reluctant, while Mrs. Elton enthusiastically insists on securing a position for her. Miss Fairfax has no illusions regarding what awaits her as a governess in the early 19th Century, and when she is forced into conversation about it with Mrs. Elton she compares it to slavery. Mrs. Elton protests, and it appears her protest is based in part on the subject hitting too close to home, both figuratively and her literal home of Bristol.

The Definition of an Accomplished Woman

Education for girls and young women in that era was designed for one purpose: “ornamental accomplishments”, as Prior quotes More in her biography. More, contrary to many people in her day, thought that women and society as a whole would benefit from education in subjects thought unsuitable for them such as “Latin, mathematics and natural history” Prior notes. Prior goes on to quote More’s 1777 Essays on Various Subjects:

One would be led to imagine, by the common mode of female education, that life consisted of one universal holiday, and that the only contest was, who should be best enabled to excel in the sports and games that were to be celebrated on it.

There was nothing a woman from a good family could hope for that would be of more value in securing a good marriage than to achieve the status of an accomplished woman. More clearly held such status in contempt.

So did Austen. In Pride and Prejudice, Caroline Bingley wants both to be considered an accomplished woman and to secure a good marriage – her eye is set on the wealthy Fitzwilliam Darcy, whose own eye in turn seems to be finding Elizabeth Bennet to be attracting its attention. A conversation ensues among the three of them where Miss Bingley says:

“[N]o one can be really esteemed accomplished who does not greatly surpass what is usually met with. A woman must have a thorough knowledge of music, singing, drawing, dancing, and the modern languages, to deserve the word; and besides all this, she must possess a certain something in her air and manner of walking, the tone of her voice, her address and expressions, or the word will be but half deserved.”

Mr. Darcy is unsatisfied with this list and adds:

“All this she must possess,” added Darcy, “and to all this she must yet add something more substantial, in the improvement of her mind by extensive reading.”

Through this dialog Austen appears to agree with More: accomplishments are of little worth without a mind improved by study.

The Company One Keeps

Hannah More’s friends and acquaintances included royalty, literary giants, influential politicians, and prominent clergy. She and her closest friends – united by their common faith in Christ – worked together on social reforms in education, poverty, and the abolition of slavery. The group came to be known as the Clapham Sect, named for the village where they met in the home of one of the wealthiest members of their small circle.

Prior writes:

[T]his fellowship of like-minded believers, “bound together by shared moral and spiritual values, by religious mission and social activism, by love for each other, and by marriage” changed history as they sought to serve God in every area of their lives, personal and public, at home and abroad. … They operated as an intimate group that “planned and labored like a committee that never dissolved” as they decided on projects and issues and mapped out their strategies for accomplishing the group’s goals.

One can’t help thinking that such a group of friends is a group well worth having if only one could.

Jane Austen showed that having a worthwhile and satisfying group of friends actually is within our grasps. In Persuasion, Anne Elliot and her cousin William Elliot discuss what it means to be in good company.

“My idea of good company, Mr. Elliot, is the company of clever, well-informed people, who have a great deal of conversation; that is what I call good company.”

“You are mistaken,” said he gently; “that is not good company; that is the best.”

This description of good company is one we can all strive to possess among our friends. We do not have to settle for shallow relationships, and even though our own circle of friends might not change history as More’s did we can still enjoy deep friendships (the best of company as Austen encourages) with the people God puts in our lives and with them we can honor him in what we do.

And when we honor God, we are always part of the best historical change there is: God building his kingdom by his Spirit through his people.

This is the best company to keep.

***

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to Jane Austen Novels and Hannah More’s Life – intersecting planes

  1. Jeannie says:

    You’ve drawn some really fascinating parallels here, Tim! The slavery part is especially interesting. I didn’t realize the significance of Mrs. Elton’s hometown of Bristol, though I do remember her reaction to Jane’s comment about “the sale of human flesh.”

    • Tim says:

      I’ve also read that the fictional Mrs. Elton’s maiden name Hawkins is the name of a real life merchant tied to the slave trade in Bristol somehow.

  2. vrein11 says:

    well done Tim! You have given me some really good things to think on today…

  3. Pingback: The Fierce Convictions of Hannah More – a review of Karen Swallow Prior’s biography of a poet, reformer and abolitionist | Tim's Blog – Just One Train Wreck After Another

  4. Pastor Bob says:

    Hard to say too much, but brevity has it s virtue.
    Well done piece of writing. Deep and insightful, written by a student of classical writing.
    This was not a fast read. Congrats again.

  5. Tuija says:

    Thanks, Tim. Interesting thoughts. Must put Prior’s book on my reading list.

    I wonder – would it be likely that Hannah More’s books were among those that Edmund Bertram recommended to Fanny Price and discussed with her? Something must have sparked Fanny’s interest in the slave trade and given her enough knowledge to ask Sir Thomas about it.

    • Tim says:

      Sir Thomas, as an MP, would have known of Wilberforce’s efforts, and I think Edmund is the type of son who pays attention to things affecting his father’s activities. He might very well have read More’s works and recommended them. Good backstory!

  6. Larus Press says:

    I love Austin and bringing Hannah More to my attention is intriguing. It is so true that the company one keeps – including literary company – can be such food for the soul. Thanks for this interesting and enlightening post, Tim.

  7. Aimee Byrd says:

    I love it when connections are made like this in reading. Thanks for sharing this one, Tim. I did put Prior’s book on my list.

  8. Adriana says:

    So interesting, Tim. I’m intrigued. You prompted me to do a little digging. As I read your post I though of JA’s letter to her sister Casandra in 1809 in which she wrote, “I do not like the Evangelicals.” Yet she by 1814, in a letter to her niece Fanny Knight, she seems to have softened toward the movement:

    ” . . . from the danger of his becoming even Evangelical, I cannot admit that.
    I am by no means convinced that we ought not all to be Evangelicals,
    & am at least persuaded that they who are so from Reason and Feeling,
    must be happiest & safest. Do not be frightened from the connection by
    your Brothers having most wit. Wisdom is better than Wit, & in the long
    run will certainly have the laugh on her side; & don’t be frightened by
    the idea of his acting more strictly up to the precepts of the New Testament
    than others.”

    I also learned that from the time she wrote Pride & Prejudice to when she wrote Mansfield Park her shift in views is apparent. I haven’t yet read Mansfield Park, so I’m curious about this shift.

    P.S. I always appreciate the good company I find here at the Train Wreck!

    • Tim says:

      I think you’ll like MP, Adriana. It certainly is more full of wisdom than wit, and in fact seems to criticize wit when engaged merely for wit’s sake.

  9. Anonymous2 says:

    Tim,
    The last section of this post grabbed me. It makes me want to form or join something similar to the Clapham Sect. Any ideas on how to do this?

    • Tim says:

      I think it starts with prayer, and then accepting the opportunities God provides for you to be with others who want to serve God. I hope you find those people popping up in your life!

  10. Pingback: Fierce Coffee Mugging | Tim's Blog – Just One Train Wreck After Another

  11. Dana Tuttle says:

    Aimee Byrd gave me Fierce Convictions for Christmas! Looking forward to getting to know Hannah More.

Talk to me (or don't)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s